As someone who works with the public every single day running a large retail operation (we have not closed for a single day), I can personally attest that the vaccinated are far more likely to hide, avoid contact with others and exhibit all manners of neurotic behaviors. In general, they appeared frightened and desperate for the next edict to tell them how to think & behave. The unvaccinated are, in general, healthy, vibrant and free of neurotic behaviors. They live as though nothing has changed. The same tends to hold true for masked vs. unmasked. In fact, our sales personnel, by mid May of 2020, learned that a masked customer was about 80% less likely to make a purchase than an unmasked customer. From a real world standpoint, it's obvious that those who have chosen to go about their lives normally, unafraid of the latest seasonal flu have fared well over the past 18 months. Those who are unable to think for themselves have fared badly and will most likely fare worse as the horrible advice they have been given begins to manifest itself in increasing sickness.
Unsurprisingly, they left out some testing factors that might go the other way. Like the fact that students and hospital patients only need to be tested if they're unvaccinated.
Let's not pile on the UKHSA. They are actually heroes, supplying us with valuable, unbiased, hard-to-find information. Their results do not depend on "cause of death reporting" and use all deaths occurring in 28 days of covid test. It slightly overstates deaths, but allows us to compare "apples with apples" regarding vaxxed vs unvaxxed.
I have a section that debunks criticisms of UKHSA data. I also explain why UKHSA adds these inane disclaimers. It is because they are forced to.
The corporate media and the Big Pharma hate these reports because "they provide fodder for antivaxxers". No one stops for a second and asks, are we sure that vax still seems like such a good idea. They just want it shut down.
So the UKHSA bureaucrats are heroes who inform us with data that is hard to obtain and has enormous value.
The "UK Vaccine hell" is not unique to UK and UK is not an especially bad country. The UK is only unique because it has UKHSA and these amazing reports. Other countries are probably doing just as badly, but the reports gloss over that.
It should be obvious that the insane drive to vaccinate all children is an attempt to mask the fact that the vaccines aren’t working well. COVID sweeps through the young without leaving much of a trace - other than a durable natural immunity. Leaving them alone would be disastrous for the permanent income plan of eternal boosters. Filling them all full of this “vaccine” lets the vaccinators claim that their immunity is *due* to the vaccine. WE SAVED THE WORLD! Oh, and we earned billions and billions and billions doing it.
My wife's brother's and his wife, who also have their 3 adult children and my wife's mother living with them all came down with a "cold" about 10-12 days ago. I asked them if any of them got tested for covid and they thought that I was crazy. They told me that they were all fully vaccinated (about 4.5-5 months ago), so it was impossible that it would be covid and was therefore a cold. I wonder how many vaccinated people have come down with some cold like symptoms and just ignored them because they believe that when it comes to covid they are bulletproof and never bother to get tested. Most people in my country didn't receive their final dose until between June and August. December to February should be quite interesting.
" people who are unvaccinated may have had past COVID-19 infection prior to the 4-week reporting period in the tables above, thereby artificially reducing the COVID-19 case rate in this population group, and making comparisons between the 2 groups less valid"
Wouldn't the vaccinated cohort's higher infection rates mean that some in their cohort also "may have had past COVID-19 infection prior to the 4-week reporting period"? And wouldn't the implications of this be very very bad?
Yes, great work again! So do all of these cases mean a trend of increases in hospitalizations/deaths among vaccinated in coming weeks/months too? Is there just a delay of those numbers, or will we see a persistence in the data "showing" that the vaccines still offer "protection" from severest outcome?
If anything polling, at least in the states, seems to indicate that unvaxxed are unafraid of COVID, and also don’t buy into NPIs. It would seem likely this means the unvaxxed would engage in more social behaviors that are far more “risky” because they may be ignoring the rules. Anecdotally, this at least matches what I’ve personally experienced. Most that I have talked to about this, on the vaxxed side, are way more likely to avoid unnecessary contact with people, even friends. And when they do associate it is in accordance with the rules. Not all mind you, but most. However, on the unvaxxed side, I have yet to meet anyone that gave a shit about masks or SD, and nay getting the jab when forced by work, or wearing a mask when forced.
Oh, I just noticed! They're claiming natural immunity is "artificially" ARTIFICIALLY!!! reducing C19 case rate in the (non-vax) group.
Natural immunity! NATURAL! ARTIFICIALLY! Do they even understand English?
As someone who works with the public every single day running a large retail operation (we have not closed for a single day), I can personally attest that the vaccinated are far more likely to hide, avoid contact with others and exhibit all manners of neurotic behaviors. In general, they appeared frightened and desperate for the next edict to tell them how to think & behave. The unvaccinated are, in general, healthy, vibrant and free of neurotic behaviors. They live as though nothing has changed. The same tends to hold true for masked vs. unmasked. In fact, our sales personnel, by mid May of 2020, learned that a masked customer was about 80% less likely to make a purchase than an unmasked customer. From a real world standpoint, it's obvious that those who have chosen to go about their lives normally, unafraid of the latest seasonal flu have fared well over the past 18 months. Those who are unable to think for themselves have fared badly and will most likely fare worse as the horrible advice they have been given begins to manifest itself in increasing sickness.
Unsurprisingly, they left out some testing factors that might go the other way. Like the fact that students and hospital patients only need to be tested if they're unvaccinated.
Let's not pile on the UKHSA. They are actually heroes, supplying us with valuable, unbiased, hard-to-find information. Their results do not depend on "cause of death reporting" and use all deaths occurring in 28 days of covid test. It slightly overstates deaths, but allows us to compare "apples with apples" regarding vaxxed vs unvaxxed.
I wrote an article about this yesterday also:
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/uk-data-shows-the-vaxxed-are-superspreaders
I have a section that debunks criticisms of UKHSA data. I also explain why UKHSA adds these inane disclaimers. It is because they are forced to.
The corporate media and the Big Pharma hate these reports because "they provide fodder for antivaxxers". No one stops for a second and asks, are we sure that vax still seems like such a good idea. They just want it shut down.
So the UKHSA bureaucrats are heroes who inform us with data that is hard to obtain and has enormous value.
The "UK Vaccine hell" is not unique to UK and UK is not an especially bad country. The UK is only unique because it has UKHSA and these amazing reports. Other countries are probably doing just as badly, but the reports gloss over that.
Simply can't be - the vaccines are perfectly "safe and effective"!!!!
The vaccine cult won't admit they've been had until this gets a whole lot worse.
Thanks very much for your work in exposing these liars.
It has been frighteningly revealing to see the utter rot in elite institution.
We need an Evelyn Waugh to amusingly point out the nakedness of our elite emperors.
> There are likely to be systematic differences in who chooses to be tested and the COVID risk of people who are vaccinated.
This sentence doesn't even make logical sense.
It should be obvious that the insane drive to vaccinate all children is an attempt to mask the fact that the vaccines aren’t working well. COVID sweeps through the young without leaving much of a trace - other than a durable natural immunity. Leaving them alone would be disastrous for the permanent income plan of eternal boosters. Filling them all full of this “vaccine” lets the vaccinators claim that their immunity is *due* to the vaccine. WE SAVED THE WORLD! Oh, and we earned billions and billions and billions doing it.
My wife's brother's and his wife, who also have their 3 adult children and my wife's mother living with them all came down with a "cold" about 10-12 days ago. I asked them if any of them got tested for covid and they thought that I was crazy. They told me that they were all fully vaccinated (about 4.5-5 months ago), so it was impossible that it would be covid and was therefore a cold. I wonder how many vaccinated people have come down with some cold like symptoms and just ignored them because they believe that when it comes to covid they are bulletproof and never bother to get tested. Most people in my country didn't receive their final dose until between June and August. December to February should be quite interesting.
The 18-29 group is approaching breakeven too. 50% two weeks ago, 33% last week, 27% this week in terms of per-capita unvax/vax case rate deltas.
" people who are unvaccinated may have had past COVID-19 infection prior to the 4-week reporting period in the tables above, thereby artificially reducing the COVID-19 case rate in this population group, and making comparisons between the 2 groups less valid"
Wouldn't the vaccinated cohort's higher infection rates mean that some in their cohort also "may have had past COVID-19 infection prior to the 4-week reporting period"? And wouldn't the implications of this be very very bad?
“Unadjusted” meaning they don’t want to adjust them.
Beautiful graph. Cases, cases, cases!
This would be really embarrassing for them—if anyone outside of us ever read about it.
Yes, great work again! So do all of these cases mean a trend of increases in hospitalizations/deaths among vaccinated in coming weeks/months too? Is there just a delay of those numbers, or will we see a persistence in the data "showing" that the vaccines still offer "protection" from severest outcome?
If anything polling, at least in the states, seems to indicate that unvaxxed are unafraid of COVID, and also don’t buy into NPIs. It would seem likely this means the unvaxxed would engage in more social behaviors that are far more “risky” because they may be ignoring the rules. Anecdotally, this at least matches what I’ve personally experienced. Most that I have talked to about this, on the vaxxed side, are way more likely to avoid unnecessary contact with people, even friends. And when they do associate it is in accordance with the rules. Not all mind you, but most. However, on the unvaxxed side, I have yet to meet anyone that gave a shit about masks or SD, and nay getting the jab when forced by work, or wearing a mask when forced.