I agree with your assessment that the efficacy of the vaccines is fading. The problem with these analysis is that they compare 2 groups (vaxxed and unvaxxed) when there really should be 4 (vaxxed without prior infection, vaxxed with prior infection, unvaxxed without prior infection and unvaxxed with prior infection). I hypothesize the unvaccinated group of people have a much higher frequency of prior infection. I'd like to think most people aren't dumb enough to get the vaccine after an infection.....
There were a lot of Brits who remained almost entirely hermetically sealed from March 2020 until July 2021. They stayed in their homes, all food and purchases were delivered to the doorstep, from which they were disinfected item by item before being touched. I have in-laws who did exactly this. Once they got vaccinated, they went out again.
So what we're seeing here is most likely to be that we unvaccinated trolls have been exposed to Covid many times over so don't catch it anymore, while the vaccinated contain a large segment who are immunologically naïve, and thus catch it at very high rates. If this is right, and the vaccines are merely worthless rather than actively harmful, then the ratios should even out as we get through the winter and head into 2022.
In my humble opinion, this vax is destined to destroy natural immunity. Common colds will soon require boosters of the big pharma vax to survive. My natural immunity is doing it's job right now as I am working in office with 3 fully vaxxed. My nose tingles and my chest has slight pain when I am in the office. I go home and it disappears. They are definitely shedding something that my natural immunity has to fight everyday.
Naturally occuring mRNA has variable "lifespans." In some instances a single strand of mRNA can be translated at ribosomes over the course of days, or maybe weeks, and make multiple translated proteins. In other instances it could be a matter of hours. An example of this is putative "memory molecule mRNAs", that when challenged by protein synthesis inhibitors (acting at mRNA the ribosomes) severely impairs learning and memory in animals. So
, unless some fairly complicated studies are done (which I'm sure those pharma hacks didn't do), we don't know what the half-life of mRNAs are. So, we don't now how long these S-protein translations persist (as antigens). To complicate that, RNAase is all over the place, in both the environment and our bodies. Anyone doing mRNA work knows that even coffee in the lab can wipe out the very low concentrations of mRNA in your sample. The bottom line is that this stuff was probably never intended to last long and I suppose it was thought it would serve as an effective antigen while it was producing a S-protein transcript. This is just another fail on the part of the so-called scientists working on that project. Having produced one of the few experimental antibodies to a small molecular weight neurotransmitter in my own lab, I can tell you that this sort of "immunology" that big pharma is selling, and I do mean selling, is just plain old fashioned snake oil without any liability whatsoever. Ask yourself why they haven't had any luck with C18, C17, C16...et al.
One must wonder what the elites and popular discourse will claim as the reason for similar if not higher case counts and deaths compared to last year, with the prevalence of vaccines. This upcoming winter is sure to be full of drama.
Imagine what happens in 10-20 years when all of these "smart" and "elite" people start developing cancers and are permanently immunocompromised and demand accommodations from a government that refuses to admit any of it was a mistake and needs a convenient scapegoat?
The tyranny and government gaslighting will be the worst humanity has ever seen, especially considering the technological tools that are available. it will be much worse than anything we are seeing now.
We are living in the beginning stages a dystopian science fiction novel and don't know it yet. This whole pandemic is the backstory to the real novel which is yet to be written.
The world elites desperately want us vaxxed ... you have to ask why when there is no compelling data to support this approach. Certainly not true health care. Hang on as time is slowly revealing the truth. Resist. I've previously stated my unwillingness to believe in a depopulation conspiracy but as more time goes by, what else could this be? My other bet is an economic reset which requires mass population control to execute. Fight back.
Is it just me or are we chasing down and attempting to quash an already infinitesimally small likelihood of death from COVID by taking something wholly experimental in an attempt to gain a fraction of a percentage of likelihood we won’t die from COVID? Like if I had to quantify the actual benefit to myself, what would it be? This is already taking up too much time and energy to be beneficial in the grand scheme of things in my life. For elderly with comorbidities, fine. For me this is a total waste of time.
It's not rocket science to work out that if the vaccine itself is toxic to the human natural immune system and then fades leaving a toxic system in its wake, the only outcome is a compromised immune system incapable of resisting further infection. Which is probably the reason we are seeing this happening.
Denominator problems aside, one can imagine a few things to be likely true. 1) the unvaccinated have a larger percent of naturally immune. 2) the vaccinated are tested LESS not more than the unvaccinated for a variety of reasons inclosing hte increased probability of being asymptomatic 3) the role of risky behaviours is complex and likely not easy to uncover but likely somewhat age cohort dependent: i.e. the youg unvaccinated are more likely to be more risk taking and hte old unvaccinated less
How many will be dying of complications due to AIDS in the coming months, in addition to the VAERS cases?
You don't need to be a virologist to see that these "vaccines" have not only been ineffective in fighting a virus that most people survive easily, but may end up contributing to mass genocide.
I just hope we can stem the mass hysteria soon, find and identify the sociopaths that created the fear and actually hold these perpetrators guilty for their crimes against humanity.
Every day verifies that what I read on the substacks first is a first and more honest draft of what I see spun in the newspapers a little while later. Today the SF Chronicle actually has a front page article on AY 4.2 , but of course it is 100% vague about what is concerning about it. The legacy media is starting to small trouble down the road and is starting battlespace prep.
My thought when reading the "explanation" from the FT was that the alternative population numbers do not make the vaccine look "super effective" again but at best "mildly helpful" against infection. Maybe I'm misreading the numbers but it seems with the maximum correction you end up in "mildly useful" territory rather than "super effective" territory?
The FT reporter is really clutching at straws. What a desperate attempt to show that the vaccines are useless after a few months! Even Pfizer admitted to the FDA on September 17 that the vaccine effectiveness after a few months was 'nor statistically significantly different from zero.'
As to the denominators, this is what the NHS says:
"As the ONS population estimates are based on the 2011 Census, they are subject to a degree of uncertainty, and do not reflect changes to the population since 2019. The ONS 2019 mid-year population estimates are likely to be an underestimate...Some of the uptake rates calculated using the ONS denominators are reported as 100%* in the publications. In these instances, the number of people who have been vaccinated exceeds the ONS population estimate for that group. "
Indeed, that is true: using ONS denominators results in far too high a vaccine takeup - over 100% in some cases, which shows that the use of ONS denominators to 'paint a more accurate picture' is phoney.
On the other hand, this is siad about NIMS denominators:
"National Immunisation Management System (NIMS) denominators are the numbers of individuals registered with the NHS who are currently alive in the resident population. Overall they likely overestimate the population and so underestimate vaccine uptake percentages, as death registration data is subject to a reporting lag...Unlike the ONS denominators which are fixed, the NIMS denominators are updated in each weekly and monthly publication, to reflect known changes to the current resident population."
So, ONS definitely underestimates the population (because vaccination rates can't be higher than 100%) whereas NIMS possibly overestimates because of delays to recording deaths.
However, the effect of deaths does not much affect the population in their 30s 40s 50s and 60s.
Ultimately, it doesn't matter whether the rates among the unvaccinated are put up or down a bit, the picture is remarkably clear: vaccine efficacy against infection has completely disappeared after 20 weeks from second dose. A large study in Qatar showed reported it as 0% after 20 weeks simply because it chose not to register negative figures. However, the data itself showed that efficacy after 20 weeks was minus 16%.
I agree with your assessment that the efficacy of the vaccines is fading. The problem with these analysis is that they compare 2 groups (vaxxed and unvaxxed) when there really should be 4 (vaxxed without prior infection, vaxxed with prior infection, unvaxxed without prior infection and unvaxxed with prior infection). I hypothesize the unvaccinated group of people have a much higher frequency of prior infection. I'd like to think most people aren't dumb enough to get the vaccine after an infection.....
There were a lot of Brits who remained almost entirely hermetically sealed from March 2020 until July 2021. They stayed in their homes, all food and purchases were delivered to the doorstep, from which they were disinfected item by item before being touched. I have in-laws who did exactly this. Once they got vaccinated, they went out again.
So what we're seeing here is most likely to be that we unvaccinated trolls have been exposed to Covid many times over so don't catch it anymore, while the vaccinated contain a large segment who are immunologically naïve, and thus catch it at very high rates. If this is right, and the vaccines are merely worthless rather than actively harmful, then the ratios should even out as we get through the winter and head into 2022.
In my humble opinion, this vax is destined to destroy natural immunity. Common colds will soon require boosters of the big pharma vax to survive. My natural immunity is doing it's job right now as I am working in office with 3 fully vaxxed. My nose tingles and my chest has slight pain when I am in the office. I go home and it disappears. They are definitely shedding something that my natural immunity has to fight everyday.
Naturally occuring mRNA has variable "lifespans." In some instances a single strand of mRNA can be translated at ribosomes over the course of days, or maybe weeks, and make multiple translated proteins. In other instances it could be a matter of hours. An example of this is putative "memory molecule mRNAs", that when challenged by protein synthesis inhibitors (acting at mRNA the ribosomes) severely impairs learning and memory in animals. So
, unless some fairly complicated studies are done (which I'm sure those pharma hacks didn't do), we don't know what the half-life of mRNAs are. So, we don't now how long these S-protein translations persist (as antigens). To complicate that, RNAase is all over the place, in both the environment and our bodies. Anyone doing mRNA work knows that even coffee in the lab can wipe out the very low concentrations of mRNA in your sample. The bottom line is that this stuff was probably never intended to last long and I suppose it was thought it would serve as an effective antigen while it was producing a S-protein transcript. This is just another fail on the part of the so-called scientists working on that project. Having produced one of the few experimental antibodies to a small molecular weight neurotransmitter in my own lab, I can tell you that this sort of "immunology" that big pharma is selling, and I do mean selling, is just plain old fashioned snake oil without any liability whatsoever. Ask yourself why they haven't had any luck with C18, C17, C16...et al.
One must wonder what the elites and popular discourse will claim as the reason for similar if not higher case counts and deaths compared to last year, with the prevalence of vaccines. This upcoming winter is sure to be full of drama.
Imagine what happens in 10-20 years when all of these "smart" and "elite" people start developing cancers and are permanently immunocompromised and demand accommodations from a government that refuses to admit any of it was a mistake and needs a convenient scapegoat?
The tyranny and government gaslighting will be the worst humanity has ever seen, especially considering the technological tools that are available. it will be much worse than anything we are seeing now.
We are living in the beginning stages a dystopian science fiction novel and don't know it yet. This whole pandemic is the backstory to the real novel which is yet to be written.
The world elites desperately want us vaxxed ... you have to ask why when there is no compelling data to support this approach. Certainly not true health care. Hang on as time is slowly revealing the truth. Resist. I've previously stated my unwillingness to believe in a depopulation conspiracy but as more time goes by, what else could this be? My other bet is an economic reset which requires mass population control to execute. Fight back.
This is exactly why they don't want a large control group of the unvaxxed.
Is it just me or are we chasing down and attempting to quash an already infinitesimally small likelihood of death from COVID by taking something wholly experimental in an attempt to gain a fraction of a percentage of likelihood we won’t die from COVID? Like if I had to quantify the actual benefit to myself, what would it be? This is already taking up too much time and energy to be beneficial in the grand scheme of things in my life. For elderly with comorbidities, fine. For me this is a total waste of time.
It's not rocket science to work out that if the vaccine itself is toxic to the human natural immune system and then fades leaving a toxic system in its wake, the only outcome is a compromised immune system incapable of resisting further infection. Which is probably the reason we are seeing this happening.
Tired: The vaccines are effective at eradicating COVID.
Wired: The vaccines drive variants to become more contagious/virulent.
Inspired: The vaccines drive variants to become specifically good at infecting the vaccinated.
Denominator problems aside, one can imagine a few things to be likely true. 1) the unvaccinated have a larger percent of naturally immune. 2) the vaccinated are tested LESS not more than the unvaccinated for a variety of reasons inclosing hte increased probability of being asymptomatic 3) the role of risky behaviours is complex and likely not easy to uncover but likely somewhat age cohort dependent: i.e. the youg unvaccinated are more likely to be more risk taking and hte old unvaccinated less
How many will be dying of complications due to AIDS in the coming months, in addition to the VAERS cases?
You don't need to be a virologist to see that these "vaccines" have not only been ineffective in fighting a virus that most people survive easily, but may end up contributing to mass genocide.
I just hope we can stem the mass hysteria soon, find and identify the sociopaths that created the fear and actually hold these perpetrators guilty for their crimes against humanity.
Every day verifies that what I read on the substacks first is a first and more honest draft of what I see spun in the newspapers a little while later. Today the SF Chronicle actually has a front page article on AY 4.2 , but of course it is 100% vague about what is concerning about it. The legacy media is starting to small trouble down the road and is starting battlespace prep.
My thought when reading the "explanation" from the FT was that the alternative population numbers do not make the vaccine look "super effective" again but at best "mildly helpful" against infection. Maybe I'm misreading the numbers but it seems with the maximum correction you end up in "mildly useful" territory rather than "super effective" territory?
The FT reporter is really clutching at straws. What a desperate attempt to show that the vaccines are useless after a few months! Even Pfizer admitted to the FDA on September 17 that the vaccine effectiveness after a few months was 'nor statistically significantly different from zero.'
As to the denominators, this is what the NHS says:
"As the ONS population estimates are based on the 2011 Census, they are subject to a degree of uncertainty, and do not reflect changes to the population since 2019. The ONS 2019 mid-year population estimates are likely to be an underestimate...Some of the uptake rates calculated using the ONS denominators are reported as 100%* in the publications. In these instances, the number of people who have been vaccinated exceeds the ONS population estimate for that group. "
Indeed, that is true: using ONS denominators results in far too high a vaccine takeup - over 100% in some cases, which shows that the use of ONS denominators to 'paint a more accurate picture' is phoney.
On the other hand, this is siad about NIMS denominators:
"National Immunisation Management System (NIMS) denominators are the numbers of individuals registered with the NHS who are currently alive in the resident population. Overall they likely overestimate the population and so underestimate vaccine uptake percentages, as death registration data is subject to a reporting lag...Unlike the ONS denominators which are fixed, the NIMS denominators are updated in each weekly and monthly publication, to reflect known changes to the current resident population."
So, ONS definitely underestimates the population (because vaccination rates can't be higher than 100%) whereas NIMS possibly overestimates because of delays to recording deaths.
However, the effect of deaths does not much affect the population in their 30s 40s 50s and 60s.
Ultimately, it doesn't matter whether the rates among the unvaccinated are put up or down a bit, the picture is remarkably clear: vaccine efficacy against infection has completely disappeared after 20 weeks from second dose. A large study in Qatar showed reported it as 0% after 20 weeks simply because it chose not to register negative figures. However, the data itself showed that efficacy after 20 weeks was minus 16%.